Aliba D'Rav
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Weekly Column
  • Politics
  • On being a rabbi
  • THE SIXTY FUND
  • SOMETHING SPECIAL
  • Wisdom Wherever You Find It

weekly column

Each week, find a commentary on something connected to verses of Torah or another source of wisdom

STATUE OF LIMITATIONS

4/7/2024

0 Comments

 
(On storing statues of Confederate generals): I like to think of them as America’s strategic racism reserve.           Erin Thompson
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
(On storing statues of Confederate generals): I like to think of them as America’s strategic racism reserve. Erin Thompson
 
I am not sure this hilarious observation needs any explication, but that never stopped me before.
 
I have family in Richmond, Virginia, and inevitably when we would visit there would be a drive on Monument Avenue. It was not to see the statues that stood in the verdant median strip, but because it is the main drag to parts of the city we had come to visit. Those statues were erected long after armed hostilities ceased between the armies of the United States (aka, the North) and the Confederate States (aka, the South). They were part of an attempt on the part of descendants of the Confederacy to reclaim the dignity they felt they had lost when the North defeated the South and imposed the rule of law as enacted by Congress.
 
It included the elimination of slavery (or, as I understand current usage, enslavement). Once you declare that it is a crime to claim ownership of another human being, it is only a matter of time until those human beings expect to be treated as equals. What nerve. And as society began to creep with excruciating lethargy toward that goal, it became necessary to remind people – the equals and the previously unequals – that things were not always that way. And one way to do it was to erect ginormous statues of the soldiers and politicians who took up arms to preserve their way of life in which men were men, women were women, and people of African heritage were chattel.
 
There are many fewer folks who would defend any semblance of slavery these days, and most of them belong to groups watched carefully by the FBI and Southern Poverty Law Center. But there are plenty of people who believe that just because history should not repeat itself, it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t celebrate that old times there are not forgotten. And honestly, I don’t care how skilled a general or competent a legislator or brave a soldier a person was in the mid-19th-century, if they were using those skills in the service of the Confederacy, they were dedicated to the proposition that some men (and all women) were not created equal. Putting a statue of Arthur Ashe at the front of the line only mitigates that fact if you never continue down the road to the rest of the canonized saints of human trafficking.
 
The mayor who had those statues on Monument Avenue removed grew up to overcome the residual obstacles placed in the way of his parents and grandparents. He was not the first Black mayor of Richmond, and therefore not the first head of the city to travel in the shadow of those who would have denied him the right to his elected office. It appears that these things take time.
 
But what should be done with the oversize representations of the heroes of the South?
 
There is an argument to make that statues and other public monuments are historical artifacts, and therefore, like archaeological treasures from past civilizations, they should be preserved for posterity. The guardians of the Confederate legacy, however, strike me as having more in mind than guarding resources for future understanding of the circumstances of the Civil War. Oversized and idealized representations of military and political leaders are designed not to call to mind any accurate representation of what happened to cause or fight the war. Those statues – created and established long after the war ended and the subjects were dead – were erected to celebrate a shameful blight on the promise of our democracy. Were a visitor from another time or culture try to analyze what they symbolized for adherents of “the lost cause,” they could not help but conclude that in defending the secession and independence of the South, those iconic figures were not merely endorsing states’ rights and economic freedom; indeed, they were defending the enforced dehumanization of an entire segment of the human family based on their race.
 
Do we need to remember these monuments? Take a picture. They add nothing to our knowledge of the men (and few women) they represent. Rather, they serve to deflect the conversations that might eliminate the obstacles to full equality for all people in this country by allowing the preservationists to lay claim to some bogus sense of righteous indignation about the past, while the great-grandchildren of the enslaved people wonder rightfully why those same folks don’t share their own indignation about being victimized.
 
There is only one reason to preserve these statues rather than melt them down: to give people a touchstone for their own remaining bigotry. That’s why Erin Thompson’s sardonic observation is correct. 
0 Comments

DEAR ROSEANN ROSEANNADANNA

3/31/2024

0 Comments

 
​A Mr. Jon Silberman of Annandale, Virginia writes in and says, “I've wondered of late what impact recent events have had on your views on interfaith outreach and your methods for pursuing it.  This is being prompted by the seeming (to me, at least) abandonment (or worse) of the Jews by America's "progressives" in the aftermath of the October 7 massacre.”
​
 
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
A Mr. Jon Silberman of Annandale, Virginia writes in and says, “I've wondered of late what impact recent events have had on your views on interfaith outreach and your methods for pursuing it.  This is being prompted by the seeming (to me, at least) abandonment (or worse) of the Jews by America's "progressives" in the aftermath of the October 7 massacre.”
 
Yeah, there’s nothing funny about this, but since you started reading, you might as well continue.
 
I will begin as I must, because if I don’t, you, the reader, will shut me down. What the Hamas terrorists did was commit an attack that was virtually incomprehensible, morally speaking. At every level – the planning, the timing, the targets, the recording, and, most of all, the actions themselves – there exists no excuse for their actions. Neither the ends nor the motives justify the means. Period.
 
And I will go a step farther: anyone who dismisses, excuses, or even downplays the criminal immorality of the October 7 actions is complicit in the acts themselves. Period.
 
But that’s not the question at hand.  The question is about interfaith work and methodology. Do I regret, or even second-guess, the work I have done for most of my adult life, including eight years as the president of a national interfaith organization? If you know me, you will not be surprised that the answer is “no.”
 
And the reason is not self-justification. Goodness, I have made enough mistakes in every aspect of my life to know that I can survive being wrong with my sense of self intact. I include my interfaith work in that category. Here’s an example: one of my predecessors on an interfaith board was quoted publicly as saying some very negative things about Jews.  (Not Israelis, if you are making that distinction; elders-of-Zion-type Jews.) I had put my trust in him, somewhat reluctantly because I did not know him well, and I appeared with him at all sorts of “unity” events. When he was called out on his statements, he asked me to stand up for him, and I asked him if he believed what he said. He replied that he regretted saying it. “Not the same thing,” I replied. I told him if he did not resign, I would seek to have him removed from the board. My trust had been misplaced. I felt no need to justify it.
 
By the logic of those who would turn away from progressives, Muslims, and others, some of whom have been wholly unsympathetic to Israel in the aftermath of the Hamas atrocities, I should have turned away from my predecessor’s entire community. I did not. In fact, I redoubled my efforts to shore up relationships within the community, whose leaders felt very insulted by the way the offender was treated.
 
Protecting the faith and freedom of practitioners and non-practitioners of faith communities is the right thing to do. It is guaranteed by the Constitution, whose structures and safeguards ought rightly to be available to every citizen (as long as they do not infringe on the same rights of others). As a person of a particular faith – that is, Judaism, subset Conservative Judaism – I am familiar with the assumption of obligations that may benefit me, but do not always indulge me. Just as my religious covenant obligates me to, say, observe the dietary laws, my covenant with America obligates me to, say, refuse to acquiesce to a registry of Muslims. I repeat: it is the right thing to do. Defending those rights may benefit me, but they do not always indulge me, especially when I am hurt or angry by the words and actions of those with whom I am allied.
 
One of the things I have been thinking about very deeply is how I/we express our devotion to Israel. The nuances of being a Jew whose life is in the diaspora but whose heart is in the East is almost impossible to put into words for myself, let alone for other Jews who share some of my shorthand. How much the more so is it difficult to express satisfactorily to those who are not Jews, and who apply a single set of their own standards to the local and the distant alike! And yet, I (and so many others in our community) expect others who are viewing Israel from a disconnected perspective or (especially for Palestinians) from an antagonistic perspective, to understand why it is that however horrific the murder and captivity of two thousand innocents are, they justify the collateral deaths of 30,000 in pursuit of the perpetrators.
 
It is why I insisted throughout my engagement with my national organization (for more than 25 years) that our concerns about the Middle East be left to other fora. Some of my closest allies in the religious freedom space were and are opponents regarding foreign affairs (and not just about Israel). Our concern for each other as friends and collaborators has allowed us to stand with each other’s pain (and, better, joy) at moments when our interests and values diverge.
 
I think it is natural, for me at least, to expect that if I have been a good friend to others, that they will be an equally good friend to me. It does not always happen. If I offer my compassion and affection only on the condition of quid pro quo, then I most certainly will be disappointed. But if I can resist the urge to generalize my pain and others’, there is hope that the hard work I and others undertake to create a more perfect union will not perish from this earth.
 
It just goes to show you, it’s always something.
0 Comments

NOT QUITE CERTAIN

3/24/2024

6 Comments

 
I begin to speak only when I am certain what I will say is not better left unsaid.      Cato the Younger
​
 
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
I begin to speak only when I am certain what I will say is not better left unsaid.      Cato the Younger
 
The world would be a quieter place if everyone adhered to Cato’s standard. In every realm in which words are the coin – politics, interpersonal relationships, scholarship, and especially blogs like this one – saying something is not the same as having something to say.  Maybe that’s why I use the insights of other people to prompt my writing. It is definitely why I have taken this long hiatus from my weekly column.
 
I can’t promise that I am back weekly, but I have enough supply of other peoples’ wisdom to last me about a year, taking time out for meals, of course. So you will see me regularly, if not on a dependable schedule. That much is no change.
 
But there have been changes, and big ones. The landscape of my family’s life has undergone radical transformation. My three wonderful children and their equally wonderful spouses all became parents (in one case, for the third time) during a six-week period last summer. The joy and excitement was indescribable…for almost four months. And then Oliver died. The eldest of the three newborns, he succumbed to complications unforeseen after necessary and seemingly successful heart surgery. He died on October 5.
 
On October 7, Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and murdered 1200 innocents. Israel, justifiably and expectedly, retaliated. And continues to retaliate.
 
These columns will be infused with my new consciousness of these events. Sometimes (like next week) one will be directly addressing some aspect of the upheaval of my soul. Other times, I am certain, you will be able to identify the stream of sadness that has been forced to the surface of my every day only by your own sensitivity or my oblique and likely unintentional choice of what I have decided not to leave unsaid.
 
The virtually simultaneous tragedies gave me an unwanted window into the workings of the human heart. My life has not been without its challenges and disappointments, but I have always been aware of my good fortune and privilege. As a rabbi, I found myself proximate to people grieving (and, also celebrating) the important transitions of their lives much like the green plastic stake that supports a tomato plant – there to give structure and strength, but best when unnoticed. Even on those days when I found myself walking down the hall from the celebration of a first-born to the funeral of a young husband and father, my emotions were best displayed as reflections of those around me, not my own.
 
And certainly, there have been powerful moments in our family life when I needed pastoring from others – one grandson was born shortly after the death of one of my best friends and almost immediately before the death of his great-grandfather. But here I was, retired from any position in which the title “rabbi” was relevant, and therefore left to navigate my life as it was integrated with those whom I desperately love: my kids and the Jewish people. What could I say about the micro- and macro-cosms of devastation and how they had impact on each other?  And by “what could I say” I do not mean to others – although any parent knows that expectation – rather, what could I say to myself?
 
Every victim (every victim) of violence in this current war rekindles the intensity of the feelings of loss and injustice surrounding our family’s great devastation. No parent or grandparent loves their child less for the circumstances of their death, whether that child is a babe in arms or an armed combatant. Would that life were so simple that we all could simply stop and dissolve into tears for awhile and then get back to life. If it doesn’t work when I am grieving our baby, how much the more so when there is an overlay of national pride and indignation.
 
And there it is. Something probably better left unsaid. So consider this a caution for the weeks ahead: you cannot depend on me to take my own good advice.  But you have been generous to indulge me in the past as I work out my issues in pixels and print.  I thank you for coming back for more.

6 Comments

THE WALTER CRONKITE FAITH AND FREEDOM AWARD

10/20/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
I was deeply honored to be presented with the Walter Cronkite Faith and Freedom Award by Interfaith Alliance, where I am president emeritus.  These are the remarks I offered on October 18, 2023.  They are pretty good. It may be a little pent-up energy from not having to write High Holy Day sermons any more!


I have spoken at many of the Walter Cronkite Faith and Freedom Award events, and my typical role was to be the person to ask for money. In fact, I saw all sorts of hands clasp wallets and pocketbooks when I reached the podium. Relax. I am not that guy tonight. But he’s coming.

This award was one of Welton Gaddy’s big ideas. It started as a project that convened a blue-ribbon panel to find a recipient for the Faith and Freedom Award – the first designee was former president Gerald Ford – and it devolved into what you see tonight. Me.

But in between, came Walter Cronkite, who had retired from his years anchoring the CBS Evening News after a stellar career as a journalist, primarily in broadcasting. It is cliché already, but he was known as the most trusted man in America, and when he retired, he trusted Interfaith Alliance. I was on the board already when it happened, and I can tell you that but for a small glitch a few years earlier, this award might have been called the Bruce Hornsby Faith and Freedom Award, which would have set a different direction for us.

But it is the direction we took that is the subject of my musing tonight. The vision of the earliest days that inspired Welton and attracted Walter also inspired a young pulpit rabbi named Jack Moline.  Me again.

The notion was pretty simple: an unholy alliance between cynical political conservatives and radically right-wing evangelical Protestants conspired to upend some of the bedrock principles of American society. For the conservatives, the goal was smaller government and freer enterprise. For evangelicals, it was the preservation of what they perceived as the hegemony of White evangelical Protestants who, out of sufferance, tolerated other Christians, Roman Catholics and Jews, but considered those who would not affirm the dominion of the King James Bible to be citizens of a lesser status.  It seemed almost like a cartoon squabble, played out on cable television and a program that most people never watched – the Old-Time Gospel Hour.

A slightly – slightly – less unholy alliance between Democratic Party operatives and liberal clergy arose to do combat. But the clergy – Protestant, Catholic and Jewish, and shortly thereafter Muslim, Sikh and Buddhist – were having none of the direction that the Democratic operatives were offering. They doubled down on the Constitution and declared, as a matter of faith, that, as we say in Aramaic, dina d’malkhuta dina, which, as you know, means “the law of the land is the law.” And that very principled stand is what energized Welton Gaddy. And any time he was persuaded to veer off that message, he’d get a phone call from Mr. Cronkite who, with clear eyed-insistence, reminded Welton that the challenge to America, the one he signed on to endorse, was from religious extremism and not the issue-du-jour.

We were then – as we were during my tenure – the only national organization doing that critical work.
It is to remind us of that mission that this award is called the Walter Cronkite Faith and Freedom Award.  It has been well over 40 years since Mr. Cronkite gave up the anchor chair at CBS, which means that people who became habituated to watching the evening news are the target audience for Rybelsus, Prevagen and Joe Namath’s Medicare Coverage Helpline – call now, it’s free! Me again.

Designating me as a recipient of this award is a recognition that I did my best to uphold the unique approach of Interfaith Alliance. I talked about it just a little yesterday when I paid my small tribute to Welton.

It is more than a matter of claiming that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.  That’s an important and endorsable crie-de-coeur, but it is not enough.  Interfaith Alliance takes the next step – I had the sad privilege to articulate it three days after the 2016 elections when the president-elect announced his intentions to register Muslims. If that happened, I said, then register me. I am a Muslim. And that’s the legacy I inherited from Welton. If I am denied the right to vote because I am Black or poor or speak a different primary language, then I am Black or poor or speak a different primary language. If I cannot marry because I am gay, then I am gay. And if I am prohibited to hold public office because I proclaim Jesus Christ to be my Lord and Savior, then I – even I – proclaim Jesus Christ to be my Lord and Savior. 

Radical empathy is what our Constitution demands and what my faith teaches. It is what was cultivated in my heart by my service to this organization and by my friend Welton.
All the other stuff challenging our country, our democracy, our citizens are the results, not the cause of our losing sight of the value of every human soul and of every person’s rights. Returning Toni Morrison or Anne Frank to a library is a victory in a skirmish. Unlocking the doors to a reproductive clinic is a correction of an act of bullying. Making artisanal baked goods available for a lesbian wedding is the repudiation of a person’s prejudice.  Interfaith Alliance is by principle obligated to support the people who oppose those injustices.

But the cause of the effect, the belief on the part of a large minority with outsized influence that their convictions must be affirmed by our society even at the cost of the human rights articulated in the only sacred document that governs the United States – the Constitution – the cause of that effect demands not only a tactical approach, not only an issue approach, not only a coalition-of-the-willing approach.  The cause of the effect cannot be addressed by using whatever name is attached to distract from the root – Christian Coalition, Moral Majority, Values Voters, Tea Party, White Pride, Christian Nationalism – in promoting our agenda of equal rights and protections. It must be addressed by words and deeds that emerge from the heart and enter the heart.

That is our unique contribution to this critical struggle to protect our first freedom. Empathy, radical empathy, can be very hard, especially when we have limited sympathy for some of our community. What Interfaith Alliance asks of you is to hold precious the people you cross the street to avoid, who attend the houses of worship you will not, who eat the foods you abhor, who speak the languages you do not understand, who affirm the sacred texts to which you object, who look askance at you for the very same reasons. Without teaching and modeling that the great blessing of America is less about celebrating and protecting what we presumably have in common than celebrating and protecting what makes us so different from one another, this nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated will not long endure.

The former is what is so skillfully and deviously foisted on a frightened and insecure segment of America by our opponents. The latter is the mission I inherited and had the privilege to represent.
I learned a tremendous amount from my years at the helm of Interfaith Alliance. I learned it primarily through the people whose work in the weeds gave them deeper insight than mine in the manicured fields. Jay Keller, Isa Hyde, Ari Geller and the team at West End Strategy, were all in place when I arrived and when I left, except for Jay who snuck into retirement ahead of me. I cannot say enough about Ray Kirstein and his extraordinary eye for the very people for whom we exist – the ones whose faith commitments and perspectives too often escape the notice of those of us so principled about protecting them.

The members of the boards that gently oversaw our efforts, led by Fred Garcia and Jay Worenklein, and supported so generously by so many others, most intensely by Julie Baugh and her family’s Baugh Foundation. I know I am in trouble trying to name some names here, but there are two people with whom I go all the way back to my early days at what was then TIA. Claudia Wiegand got roped into the board out of devoted friendship that began in my wife’s book club, and she was actually the very first person to suggest I succeed Welton. And David Currie who was at the time the only person I ever knew in all of West Texas has proved over and over again that if they can grow ‘em like him out there, there is no explaining the rest of the state. I want to mention also Katy Joseph, who did so much to shape our maturing into areas of concern on the ground that would have escaped my notice at the altitude I preferred. There’s a Talmudic teaching, make someone your teacher and acquire a friend.  That’s Katy. As for the rest of you, please forgive me for overlooking your name or the names of the people unable to be here tonight. Or don’t. I’m retired.

I had a little trouble figuring out how to end these remarks. I was preparing them in the midst of a family tragedy that pulled at my heart and my focus with relentless cruelty. But I got a small respite about ten days ago when an essay appeared in the Washington Post written by columnist Kate Cohen who has written a book publicly declaring herself an atheist. God bless her. In my days at Interfaith Alliance, her right to be unfettered by the arrogance of religious practitioners was just as much our concern as anyone professing a faith.

However, most of the essay was her critique – no, let me call it her denigration – of the entire endeavor of religious devotion. You have heard it all before, though not always as eloquently. Religion is too privileged and not responsible enough.  It is arrogant even in professing its compassion. It is invested in a fantasy and disconnected from reality. It is the source of oppression, bigotry, divisiveness, abuse, hatred, and repressiveness. She’s a good researcher and a good writer, though I hasten to add she is an opinion writer, not a successor to Walter Cronkite.

But, to quote my late friend Welton, I’ll tell you what. She’s not wrong. I am not sure she is right, but she’s not wrong. You and I, we are going to go back to our synagogue, church, temple, gurdwara, mosque, meeting hall, or other sacred precinct and run the risk of being lulled into complacency over how we have allowed so many Americans and so many others to see what we do in our faith communities as sowing a sense of division with those unlike ourselves. But it is not enough for those of us who are here tonight, who support Interfaith Alliance, to combat the hatred among our faith communities and within our faith communities for people who diverge from the teachings of our faith communities.

Radical empathy is not only for the public square. It is for your sanctuary. It is for your scripture study. It is for your family table. It applies to your uncle the MAGA Republican and to your aunt the socialist, to that kid from another religion or no religion that your cousin is dating – not to affirm that they are right, but to affirm their rights. For us, supporting beliefs and convictions and faiths must be an inviolable matter of the Constitution, and supporting the Constitution must be an inviolable matter of faith. That’s the only way Interfaith Alliance can work. That’s the only way our country can work.

I sound pretty passionate and maybe a little wise. But I am 71 years old and retired, and it took me more than a little while to get here. I remember Welton telling me when a TV anchor who was not Walter Cronkite was given this award for his coverage of a national emergency, even though he was notoriously hostile to Jews, that the Faith and Freedom Award was not for lifetime achievement, but for a singular achievement. My qualification for this award is for the singular achievement of being saturated to my soul by the good work of the organization that chooses to honor me tonight. I hope I have advanced the cause so that it does not take so many years to change the hearts and minds of another generation. For that singular achievement, I rely on you. And so does this beloved country. Thank you all for this great honor.

​PS -- Weekly columns are returning very soon.


0 Comments

​LIVING INTO THE PSALM

7/21/2023

0 Comments

 
 
My first trip to Israel was the summer after I graduated from high school.  I was eighteen.  The eight weeks were transformative. Of course, I toured and saw the landmarks of history, ancient and modern. But there were experiences that could have happened only in Israel that made an impact on my soul.
 
One was the morning our guide took us to the top of Mt. Arbel in the Galilee to give us an overview of the land.  When he finished, he clapped and said, “Okay, back to the bus.” We stood and turned around, at which point he shouted, “Where do you think you’re going?” And then he pointed at our buses parked at the bottom of a sheer cliff. We climbed down together, astonished at what we accomplished.
 
Another was the week we spend excavating the archaeological dig at the south wall of the Temple Mount. I shlepped and sifted dirt from a small room, reaching deep into history, and recovering coins, dice, bones, and more. When I visit that now-completed dig, I can still identify the location of my very small contribution.
 
And then there was the singing. We were visited just a couple of times by a young woman with a guitar. We learned “Shoshana, Shoshana, Shoshana,” “A Night Like This,” and a modern setting of the end of Psalm 128: May God bless you from Zion. May you see the goodness of Jerusalem all the days of your life. May you see your children’s children. Peace on Israel.” These and other songs became the soundtrack of my life, right alongside the music of the Beatles, Stevie Wonder, and Linda Ronstadt.
 
I guess I could have been inspired by an encounter with nature anywhere in the world, and there is no shortage of opportunities to drill down (literally) into history wherever people have lived for many generations. And music triggers emotions that flourish in any setting.  But these were my memories, and fifty-plus years later, I still live into them.  Not too many years ago I got another chance to descend the Arbel cliffs. And I have participated in other digs. And Psalm 128 makes a regular appearance in both prayer and study.
 
But.
 
This summer, I was awash in the blessing that the psalm promises. In 1970 and since, I was blessed to see the goodness of Jerusalem, which has stayed with me all the days of my life.  In those intervening years, my wife and I had the privilege and joy of raising three extraordinary children; just this season, in the course of six weeks, all three of them were blessed with children of their own. I have seen our children’s children.  I am so full of gratitude that there is barely room for air.
 
Of course, there is one not-so-small piece of the blessing left: peace on Israel. It is the dream of generations, and not just modern ones. Is it overreaching to hope that the abundance that is mine, cherished and amassed over a lifetime, is one my children and children’s children will inherit?
 
Not if we work for it.  Not if we keep singing.
0 Comments

​BETWEEN BLESSING AND BEHOLDING

5/28/2023

3 Comments

 
 
My description of an ancient ritual and our family tradition comes as a prelude to an announcement of little consequence to anyone but me, but you deserve to know.
 
The picture that accompanies this column represents our take on the mitzvah (commandment) to initiate Shabbat by lighting candles, with the appropriate blessing, at least 18 minutes before sunset on Friday. In Jewish homes, the moment is most often conducted by a woman, with others gathered around. The strictures of Shabbat forbid the kindling of a flame, but the ritual of reciting a blessing requires it to precede the action it sanctifies. Once the blessing to light candles is recited, it is Shabbat. And once it is Shabbat, you can’t light the candles. So, the woman lights the flame, waves her hands toward her face as if to gather the light, and then covers her eyes to recite the blessing. When she removes her hands, she beholds the flames as if for the first time, thus “kindling the lights of Shabbat,” as the blessing proclaims.
 
But between the recitation of the statutory blessing and the beholding of the lights, time is frozen. In that pause, the woman has an intensely personal audience with God. Honestly, it does not matter whether she has a traditional belief in God (whatever that is) or is a committed skeptic, those intervening seconds contain a spiritual power that is second to none. Author Ira Steingroot correctly observes that “men davven (pray) together for hours in the synagogue hoping to achieve the drama and transforming magic of the wave of a woman’s hands.” During those seconds, the Holy of Holies opens to receive whatever she brings to offer: her hopes, her heartbreak, her anxiety, her anger, her longing, her love.
 
My wife has occasionally volunteered what she offers in those moments, but I intuited from the beginning of our life together that it was not mine to ask. We are enough alike in our values that I have known since we first became parents that the well-being of our children in general and in specific was always part of the moment.
 
I witnessed my mother light candles weekly for close to twenty years, and then whenever I was in her home for Shabbat for forty-some years more. She, too, took that time for something powerful enough to mist her eyes each week. It made an impression on everyone who experienced it. Near the end of her life, when she was bed-bound and unable to come down the half-flight of stairs to the candlesticks, her Filipina caregiver would light the candles, call her on Facetime in her bed, and hold the phone toward the candles so she could have that precious moment.
 
It is traditional to light two candles to provide an extra measure of light for the joy of Shabbat, and they should burn for long enough to illuminate the evening meal and perhaps some singing and studying afterward – generally around three hours.  We have inherited the tall silver candlesticks that traveled with my wife’s ancestors from Europe, and she began the custom of adding a candle for each of the members of our immediate family as it grew – five eventually. When our eldest found her soulmate, we added a sixth, and the addition of a candle on Friday night became the hallmark of welcoming new members to the family, including our two perfect grandchildren.
 
You will notice in the picture ten candles – two in the silver holders and eight in the colorful set we acquired in Israel. (Yes, they are part of a Chanukkah set, but we have other holders for that!) And in front of those eight are three holders without candles. They were gifts for Mother’s Day this year, one from each of our kids. Over the course of June and July, God willing and medical science attending, each one of our three children’s families will give us cause to add a candle. Three first cousins, less than six weeks apart. Our hearts are so full we could burst. Those moments on Friday night between blessing and beholding are more intense than you might imagine.
 
The announcement is an anti-climax. You now know why I am going to take a long break from these columns. All of my energy will be available to these little lights of mine. Maybe I will pop up occasionally in your inbox or news feed, but mostly I will be living in that moment between blessing and beholding.  

Picture
3 Comments

HELLO FRIENDLY NEIGHBOR

5/21/2023

1 Comment

 
Everybody lives next door to somebody in this town
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
Everybody lives next door to somebody in this town. 
​  Jen Halperin
 
I grew up in Wilmette, Illinois on a horseshoe-shaped street with a little pipestem at the top. Maybe everybody’s neighborhood was like mine, but if it were, the world would probably be in a little better shape.  The kids in my generation alone – all of whom are now senior citizens – made a lot of difference in their respective chosen professions: law, medicine, business, and more. One guy in law enforcement cracked a huge murder case, and another had two distinguished careers as a police chief. Two guys are TV writers (different genres) of renown. One is an expert on American songwriting. One is a world-famous triathlete. I am just scratching the surface.
 
I now live in Alexandria, Virginia, as close to DC as Wilmette is to Chicago. Over the years, my proximate neighbors have served Presidents of the United States, as chair of the Joint Chiefs, high up in the Federal Reserve, and as Members of Congress and the Senate.
 
In Los Angeles, everyone who isn’t in show business has a neighbor who is. In New York, it’s likely finance or law. A college friend’s father was mayor of their small city in Iowa. Everybody lives next door to somebody, and not just in this town.
 
I am not sure what the allure is of reflected glory. Whether it is fame or notoriety, people take a peculiar pride in proximity. I have noticed my own inclination to try to establish connections with new acquaintances by mentioning someone we have in common – as if that means anything!
 
And, by the way, I find it’s true even among folks who live a lower-profile life. “I know so-and-so” is a very usual way to establish credentials when trying to enter a social circle or exert some kind of influence.
 
Sometimes the behavior reaches levels of absurdity. I once stood next to my wife as a man chatted her up, and when he asked her name, he responded, “Oh, are you related to Jack?”  She said she was, and he replied, “He’s a good friend of mine. How is he doing?” (She said, “Why don’t you ask him yourself?”)
 
All sorts of dismissive idioms have become current to describe this phenomenon. Name-checking, humble brag, and a couple too profane for a family column are ways the kids these days try to show they have no use for the games grown-ups play, but it’s a sham. The culture of celebrity in which we live has spilled over from show business to whatever the business is in any neck of the woods, and the only thing that distinguishes the young Turks from the old poots is who is considered worth mentioning.
 
I will admit that it is hard to avoid dropping the name of a famous neighbor when the opportunity arises. But it’s worth practicing restraint. Everybody lives next door to somebody, but every somebody has to live in that next door.  Sometimes home is the only refuge from that fame or notoriety, and the Grand Poohbah is no less entitled to it than the grunt who just put in an eight-hour shift. If someone well-known chooses not to advertise where they live, basic decency demands that the rest of us respect it.
 
And notwithstanding the cliché that it’s not what you know, it is who you know (actually “whom” is correct here), living near an accomplished or notorious person doesn’t make you fortunate, prestigious, or contagiously famous.

I will tell you who is worth living near. The family that lived across the street from that house in Wilmette, Illinois was no one you ever heard of. But every little kid in the neighborhood knew that if you rang the doorbell, the mom who answered always had a cookie for you.

That’s even better than living next door to the rabbi.
1 Comment

​A FAITH IN BETTER TOMORROWS

5/14/2023

0 Comments

 
I know the future is on my side.
 
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
I know the future is on my side.    Clarence Darrow
 
Something we hear a lot of today is the challenge to be on the right side of history. Depending on what you expect that side to be, you are either encouraged or horrified to consider what that challenge means.
 
For me, the most powerful moment in Kander and Ebb’s “Cabaret” (done to perfection in the film version, I think) is in the beer garden scene. An apple-cheeked young tenor is shown in close-up as he begins to sing an engaging song of optimism, “Tomorrow Belongs to Me,” which gradually engages the patrons, who rise to sing with him. As the camera pulls back, we discover the singer is a member of Hitler Youth, complete with khaki uniform and swastika armband. And in the crowd, only a grizzled old man remains seated and dismayed.
 
I shake each time I see that scene, and I can feel my body tense as it approaches, whether on screen or on stage. No doubt, the desire of the characters in that vignette is to be on the right side of history.
 
So, I think it is slightly dangerous to find wisdom in the words of Clarence Darrow. His assertion that the future is on his side comes near the end of his very long (like 3-day) summation of his defense of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, two college students who had committed a murder just to get away with the perfect crime. Darrow was arguing at length against the death penalty for this crime, insisting that capital punishment would eventually be outlawed entirely. Multiple times he referenced the trends in the law and public opinion, asserting the inevitability of its abolition. He was right for a while. Then he was wrong.
 
I am struck by the deluge of reactionary legislation in statehouses all over the country. So much of it has to do with gender and sexual identity. I am genuinely mystified at the hysteria in some quarters over love, libraries, and lavatories, all of which are drawing more regulation than pollution and food safety these days (which, face it, are more likely to threaten heterosexual lawmakers than gender-neutral bathroom stalls). The scramble to erect blockades to the honest public expression of an honest internal landscape says more about the insecurity of the proponents of these barbed-wire barriers than anything else.
 
They are fighting a losing battle and, as such, are on the wrong side of history. You may hear that as a moral judgment, but it is not – it is a practical one. Everyone knows and loves someone who is gender non-conforming, just like everyone knows someone who has a same sex orientation, just like everyone knows someone with Type B Positive blood. Being unaware leaves that detail where it ought to be: the private business of the individual person. And as the transformative campaign for marriage equality showed, that personal connection is the most effective tool in overcoming bias.
 
Unlike the past, however, the future is not irreversible. Darrow did not live to see the death penalty essentially outlawed by the Supreme Court, but it was.  He also did not live to see that decision effectively nullified. There is no limitation to the havoc that can be caused by unshakeable opinions and unlimited resources. It helps if you have a catchy song and a sweet-faced child to sing it, but even that isn’t necessary. Mostly, you need fear. If more people were afraid of being executed than being the victim of a capital crime, Darrow would be right again.
 
The aspiration Darrow expresses in this piece of wisdom reflects a confidence in the moral arc of the universe (as he perceived its curvature). It is tinged with outrage and arrogance, which is not unusual for defense attorney’s summation. Because I agree with him in this circumstance, I include it as a bit of wisdom, worth inspiring every righteous cause.
 
But lots of people want the future to be like the past in any one or anther of its many iterations. They want to set a particular moment in concrete and put a boot on the wheels of progress. The past or its resultant present is on their side, and they want the future to be also.
 
So before taking too much inspiration from Darrow, it is worth asking yourself whether the right side of history on which you wish to be is one of progress or retreat. I know which side I hope I am on.

0 Comments

​THE MIRACLE OF ME

5/7/2023

0 Comments

 
​The physicists may contemplate billions of self-consistent universes…but we should not neglect our own modest universe and the fact of our own existence.

Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
The physicists may contemplate billions of self-consistent universes…but we should not neglect our own modest universe and the fact of our own existence.  Alan Lightman
 
I am continually stunned by the images from the James Webb Space Telescope. With this relatively small piece of hardware that we somehow managed to catapult into space, we have been able to see almost to the very beginning of the universe we inhabit.  The event or events that initiated the cosmos that we behold happened so long ago that we cannot imagine it. The faint fuzz of light that somehow has been identified as a remnant of the Big Bang is forever away.
 
According to people who study this stuff – and I am not among them – everything that exists in the physical universe began at that moment, which lasted a split second as we measure time. Look to any direction in the night sky with whatever device you can find, and you will see the results of that singular event. Stars and their (presumed) planets, galaxies, black holes, and even the ether that pervades the space among them (and, yikes, even the space in which the ether exists) all emerged from that combustible moment.
 
Now look in the mirror. You, too. Every part of you – every hair, fingernail, freckle – and the whole of your flesh emerged in that moment. It began a journey that happened so long ago you cannot imagine it, forever away. Just like everything else.
 
Alan Lightman, whom I have quoted before, is a remarkable person, a spiritual atheist. He completely rejects the very notion of an uber-being who reigns over the universe of its own creation. As a believer, I can forgive him this small detail because it has been a long time since anyone spoke to my sense of amazement so powerfully. (I think I have to go back to J. Allen Hynek, my astronomy professor at Northwestern University, who had a cameo in “Close Encounters of the Third Kind,” and who paced off the relative size of the universe in a lecture hall.) I recommend (again) Lightman’s book, Probable Impossibilities, as a master class in awe.
 
The simple fact of existence is wildly unlikely. As of this writing, there is no explanation of how the universe came into being. Yes, “God spoke, and it was,” if you like (and I do), but that affirmation only pushes the question back to that unlikely split-second when the notion of creation arose for an inexplicable reason. In our own universe, perhaps only one of many, there are motes of dust tinier than tiny, nuclear furnaces that dwarf our solar system, holes in the fabric of space that can swallow entire galaxies. On the third rock from the sun there lives a species of creatures that tossed an eye up beyond their atmosphere to bear witness to it all. What are the odds?
 
When you think of it that way, that human race is nothing special. Everything that we are existed a long time before it combined into us, and it will remain as long as there is our universe. We are one example of this phenomenon called life, which may or may not exist in any given precinct in this universe.
 
What makes us different? We each have the ability to look outside the collective of matter and energy that is our body and imbue it with meaning. Why do I thrill to images from the Webb Telescope that show clouds of space gunk birthing stars, or tandem galaxies dancing around the edge of a black hole? Don’t disparage my answer as glib: because I can. I do not have the ability to prove or disprove the notion that we-all/I-myself exist for a purpose or accidentally. But the very fact that I do exist is as completely unlikely as it is, with the right set of data, predictable.
 
I don’t deny the miracles in the Bible or anywhere else just because I can’t explain them. In that sense, they are no different than the Big Bang. It is not the fact of their occurrence or whether the reportage was exaggerated for effect that is any concern to me. It is the gift that Allan Lightman identifies that some of us humans use to good effect and others squander that is important: meaning. Without it, my existence would be, literally, un-remarkable.
 
I do not deny the miracle of me. And neither should you deny the miracle of you.
0 Comments

​ALL MODESTY ASIDE…

4/30/2023

1 Comment

 
Don’t be so humble. You’re not that great.  ​
Wisdom Wherever You Find It
 
Don’t be so humble. You’re not that great.    Golda Meir
 
The term “humble brag” is of very recent origin, but the behavior it describes has been around a long time.  Someone who makes a self-deprecating comment in order to draw attention to something they really want to boast about is humble bragging.  Imagine FDR saying, “I really didn’t deserve to win a record-breaking fourth consecutive term as president.” Or Simone Biles tweeting, “I am just too tiny to have beaten all those longer, stronger gymnasts.” Or Bill Gates proclaiming, “I’m really not that generous; it’s just that when you are the richest person in history you have to do something with all that money.”
 
According to Simcha Dinitz, who was a close aide to Golda Meir, this quotation was something she said many times. There is no authenticated recipient of this excruciating put-down, but it is delicious to imagine who the first victim might have been. If Golda were there, it might have been our father Jacob, who effaced himself before the Holy One (Genesis 32:11) by protesting, “I am a smaller person than deserves all the kindness and honesty that You have done for me…”
 
When I was in seminary, a fellow student was called upon to interpret a teaching in class by a notoriously tough professor. He began his remark with the Hebrew phrase, common among scholars, “According to my inadequate opinion,” at which moment the professor interjected, “That goes without saying.” It was Golda-worthy.
 
I must admit that I have my own history of humble bragging.  I am reminded of it every day that I sit behind my computer.  My ego wall, a well-known Washington practice, includes personal messages from three US Presidents, a governor, and a mayor.  And those are the ones I framed.  And lest you think that by closing them off in my office I am showing some restraint, I will also admit that it is the room we use for coats whenever we have guests. On my phone, ever at the ready, you can find pictures of me with actors, rockers, a country star or two, political figures, ambassadors, and an internationally-famous fashion designer with his arm around my wife. You can tell how humble I am about them because I did not mention any names.
 
What is the harm in a little braggadocio? Well, nothing really in and of itself.  I think it depends on the purpose. I think of the late civil rights hero John Lewis when I consider this dilemma. Here was a man who spent a lifetime using the example of his own life to inspire others to “get into good trouble.”  From his story of preaching to the chickens to his teenaged encounters with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ralph Abernathy to his subsequent long career as one of the most consequential political leaders in American history, Lewis had no sense of shyness about what he had done and whom he knew.  The walls of his office in the House Office Building were covered with pictures of him with presidents, politicos, and people of the various movements he supported. He would, if asked, tell you the story of any of them. Depending on why you came to see him, he would steer you to a photograph of someone he hoped would inspire you.
 
Is that why I have pictures of prominent people on my office wall and smartphone?  Sure, that’s the ticket.
 
The fact is, all of us have accomplished something worth a brag, and pretending otherwise is some combination of insecurity and arrogance. It is also true that all of us have epically failed at something worth being ashamed of, and pretending otherwise is likewise a combination of insecurity and arrogance. What we did is worth the telling – but it’s over. Investing effort in being coy about any of it is, I think, a waste of time. And that’s Golda Meir’s point.
 
Just own it. And don’t flaunt it. But use your encounters and experience to get into some good trouble, and to encourage others to do so, too.  Then you really will be that great.

1 Comment
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Author

    Jack Moline is a rabbi, non-profit exec, and social commentator.  

    Archives

    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    October 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Weekly Column
  • Politics
  • On being a rabbi
  • THE SIXTY FUND
  • SOMETHING SPECIAL
  • Wisdom Wherever You Find It